Better than the other two, for certain, but still more of the same painful dialogue. I was a Star Wars super fan in high school, and the opening of episode I was a pretty big deal to me, but I've lost most of my love for the saga as a result of the middling quality of episodes I and II. I went into episode III optimistic, wanting to love it. I liked it, but not sure if I loved it like IV,V, and VI. random thoughts: (spoilers)
-performance wise, Palpatine/Emperor/Sidious carried the film. His delivery, and dare I say dialogue, was much more reminiscent of the pacing and style of all the acting in IV-VI.
-Ewan McGregor's performance was a pleasant surprise. I felt he was a bit of a drag on the other two, although he didn't have much of a script to work with. Here he was solid, though his scenes with Hayden Christensen only highlighted the latter's complete misplacement in his role. Which has made me wonder if the primary problem with these films is in the casting, with the script and editing being secondary handicaps. I have to wonder if we would have a truly amazing trilogy on our hands if a more comlex and talented actor had been cast as Anakin. Many of you will laugh at the idea, but the first actor to come to mind would be Colin Farrel. I know it would have been impossible, i'm just saying "what if?"
-Sam Jackson still couldn't get his delivery right.
-Natalie Portman was still bad. Though I'm not much of a fan of hers. On a related note, only today did I realize that Padme's death was pretty unmoving. I mean, this is a central character to this trilogy, and her death wasn't even half as moving as Obi-Wan's in episode IV when we knew him for 10 minutes.
-The opening rescue scene was great...paced and edited more like IV-VI. Same thing with the editing between the Anakin/Obi-Wan and Yoda/Sidious battles. The cuts toggling between the two scenes was reminiscent of the brilliant editing in VI , between the charge on the Death Star and Luke's fight with Vader in Sidious' chambers.
-Yoda's entrance into Sidious' chambers, paralyzing the guards with a shake of his hand, was one of the best moments in both trilogies.
-I loved the return to ship that IV opens with....with bright white walls and light. I wish there would have been more of that set. It was a familiar sight and welcome relief to the darkness of film. Same thing with the final shot of Vader and Sidious in the familiar command room with Grand Moff Tarkin.
-Someone mentioned that the entire saga seems more about Anakin/Vader now than Luke Skywalker. I think this was Lucas' intention all along.
-Give credit to Lucas for the very overt political statements made in the film. It could have been disastrous if not handled correctly...I thought he did a good job of making it work.
-I was hoping for one more cockpit hyperspace shot. Alas...
-One thing I missed:what was the point of the battle on kazhyyyk? what was going on, and why was yoda there? I wish there was more of the wookies, which leads me my final comment...
-I hope we get Lucas' full cut on DVD. I hope he doesn't just give us a few chickenshit "deleted scenes."
Again, the film was overall much more likeable than the previous two episodes. I believe this is because stylistically (editing, pacing, etc) it was a bit more like IV-VI, there was a more complex conflict at the center of the story, and its proximity to the imagery, characters, and themes in episodes IV-VI made it better and more familiar by default. As the film inched closer to the (more intriguing and less convoluted) story in IV-VI, it became not only more fun to watch, but more solid--emotionally and thematically.
Lastly, I think I've finally pinpointed what has been an intangible dislike for the CGI backdrops of the I,II, and III. And I noticed it while dissecting the editing style. You see, in IV, V, and VI, the sets and backdrops are very tangible, have more depth, and for lack of a better term, feel more
real. When, in those films, we are taken (via the editing) from Degobah to Hoth, or the Death Star to Tatooine, or Endor to wherever, we really feel like we are being taken into another complete world. It never occurs to us that these are in fact locales on earth, or were created in a studio or soundstage. The organic backdrops strike a perfect balance between tangible familiarity and other-worldly sci-fi imagination that tricks our minds into believing in this vast, diverse, beyond-your-wildest-dreams universe. Meanwhile, throughout the course of I,II, and III, we are fully cognizant of the fact that these locales and characters are animated and are not tangible. All the systems sorta kinda look the same, or at the very least, the backdrops have the same hue. Therefore, the "buying-in" to Lucas' universe is more difficult...it requires more effort to escape to this world, to live in it and identify with the characters in it. Whereas from the first few shots in episode IV, we were sold and immediately ensconced in it. I know I may not be saying anything too profound here, that a lot of this goes without saying, but i think it may have taken this current trilogy, with all its advanced animation and graphics and effects, to truly highlight just how good the original trilogy was. In other words, while before we were enamored with Lucas' universe if not exactly knowing why, I think now we have a point of reference in how he was successful in getting us to escape to his world, which could only be realized precisely with a juxtaposed relative failure.
(Edited by roadie at 10:46 am on May. 21, 2005)
"Is this what you want you want to do with your life, man? Suck down peppermint schnapps and try to call Morocco at 2 in the morning?"