featuresfans.com
message board| wiki| fmb archive| album art| blog
the features message board
main | posts | members | statistics | search
TOPIC: Columbia, Missouri loves The Features
Posted  Sunday, June 20, 2004 at 2:00 PM
Post 1 of 12
http://www.showmenews.com/2004/Jun/2004061...7Go!002.asp
I am a horse with no name.
Posted  Sunday, June 20, 2004 at 4:18 PM
Post 2 of 12
Is a rave review from a guy named Bland a good thing?
grass stains, airplanes, anything and everything
Posted  Sunday, June 20, 2004 at 6:46 PM
Post 3 of 12
I'd say its a little better than a bland review by a guy named Rave.
Posted  Sunday, June 20, 2004 at 7:01 PM
Post 4 of 12
"Quote from joeywade on Jun. 20, 2004 at 5:46 PM"
I'd say its a little better than a bland review by a guy named Rave.
well done!
tell me facts tell me facts tell me facts
tell me facts throw your arms around me
Posted  Wednesday, June 23, 2004 at 1:48 AM
Post 5 of 12
L...A...M...E...
Posted  Wednesday, June 23, 2004 at 9:37 AM
Post 6 of 12
Hilarious! I mean, jesus why did he think he could possibly write a review about The Features with a name like Bland? Oh god... please, critics out there who want to write about the Features, especially when you are located in markets where the Features have not had a lot of exposure, do not write a review if you're last name will produce hilarity and ridicule on our board! Thank you. Perhaps someone will start a thread on the Do's and Don'ts for Critical Reviewers and their last names?
Posted  Wednesday, June 23, 2004 at 10:25 AM
Post 7 of 12
So semi-clever quips and opinions on the quality of popular music are out? O.K.
grass stains, airplanes, anything and everything
Posted  Wednesday, June 23, 2004 at 1:36 PM
Post 8 of 12
Naw, I'm just talking about how we should properly document on the boards who can write articles about the Features based on last names, that's all. Please, continue with semi-clever quips and opinions, TF.
Posted  Wednesday, June 23, 2004 at 1:50 PM
Post 9 of 12
Who cares what his name is?
Personally I'm tired of reading music reviews that feel the need to use witty, obscure little descriptions of how a band sounds like, "If the Yeah Yeah Yeah's were hypnotized into believing they were GreenDay and then sent to a panda farm to drink wassail on the 4th of July."

All in all, he didn't reference too many other bands. And he gave them a GOOD review. And he used the word "presaging".

I think we should send this guy a cake.
You can't give up hope just because it's hopeless. That's when you have to hope even harder, and stick your fingers in your ears and go "la la laaah!"
Posted  Wednesday, June 23, 2004 at 2:15 PM
Post 10 of 12
"Quote from Chiren on Jun. 23, 2004 at 1:50 PM"
"If the Yeah Yeah Yeah's were hypnotized into believing they were GreenDay and then sent to a panda farm to drink wassail on the 4th of July."
biggrin.gif I'd rather read that than, "They sound like the yeah yeah yeah's and Green Day." I think there's room for creativity in music reviews as long as it's accurate.
Daigle is all we need to make the night complete
Posted  Wednesday, July 7, 2004 at 10:18 AM
Post 11 of 12
hehe
it's true MO loves them.
Soon, very soon, the features should be featured in Playback. Which is awesome, believe me. I'm interning for them this semester... read up. biggrin.gif
...love fights
Posted  Tuesday, July 13, 2004 at 12:05 PM
Post 12 of 12
"Quote from enemyroses on Jul. 7, 2004 at 9:18 AM"
hehe
it's true MO loves them.
Soon, very soon, the features should be featured in Playback. Which is awesome, believe me. I'm interning for them this semester...
wink.gif plug plug plug plug plug
You can't give up hope just because it's hopeless. That's when you have to hope even harder, and stick your fingers in your ears and go "la la laaah!"