featuresfans.com
message board| wiki| fmb archive| album art| blog
the features message board
main | posts | members | statistics | search
TOPIC: The Features, National TV Debut
Posted  Wednesday, January 19, 2005 at 7:44 PM
Post 1 of 140
That's right, the guys will be making their national TV debut on ABC's Jimmy Kimmel show on Feb. 2nd. Please check your local times and listings for exact time.
Posted  Wednesday, January 19, 2005 at 7:46 PM
Post 2 of 140
Oh my god, this is both awesome and hilarious.

I'm going to tape the hell out of this show.

Jimmy Kimmel....ha!
That's so NA.
Posted  Wednesday, January 19, 2005 at 9:46 PM
Post 3 of 140
Seems like Universal is just now actively trying to get the band some attention. Everyone ought to be extra alert right now since these next few months will probably be critical to the band's success...
Posted  Wednesday, January 19, 2005 at 10:12 PM
Post 4 of 140
So...there needs to be some sort of mass viewing. This is amazing.
~Digsy S. Slattery

My New York City Exploits
Posted  Wednesday, January 19, 2005 at 10:31 PM
Post 5 of 140
Awesome news! I'm still surprised they haven't done Conan yet since the dude that books it lives in Nashville (or at least did as of 2 years ago).
I TOTALLY AGREE!


Keith, you are destined to rock. Never forget this.
-SLACK

Posted  Wednesday, January 19, 2005 at 10:33 PM
Post 6 of 140
Jimmy Kimmel is one of my favorites.... Go Features!
Posted  Wednesday, January 19, 2005 at 11:41 PM
Post 7 of 140
fuck that asshole
oh the drudgery of being wet
Posted  Thursday, January 20, 2005 at 12:20 AM
Post 8 of 140
How very mature of you. I think the guy that books for Conan (that is from Nashville) probably doesn't want to look like he is playing favorites.

Even if you comment was in jest it surely did not appear to be.


Michael
Posted  Thursday, January 20, 2005 at 2:01 AM
Post 9 of 140
"Quote from michael on Jan. 20, 2005 at 12:20 AM"
How very mature of you. I think the guy that books for Conan (that is from Nashville) probably doesn't want to look like he is playing favorites.

Even if you comment was in jest it surely did not appear to be.


Michael
Stopforme has always been the beacon of maturity and tolerance around here. I'm just glad she's around to tell us what’s cool and what isn't. Her "guidance" has had a HUGE impact on how I live my life, and for that I'm truly grateful. I'm sure everyone else feels the same.
Posted  Thursday, January 20, 2005 at 2:37 AM
Post 10 of 140
"Quote from joeywade on Jan. 20, 2005 at 3:01 AM"
Stopforme has always been the beacon of maturity and tolerance around here. I'm just glad she's around to tell us what’s cool and what isn't. Her "guidance" has had a HUGE impact on how I live my life, and for that I'm truly grateful. I'm sure everyone else feels the same.
if you don't really care, can't you just ignore her? i mean, you're only going to start something by saying that, when she wasn't saying anything about you or your opinion, or anything. she might have been joking; she might not have been joking. does it really matter?
anyway, i really like stopforme, and i'm not sticking up for her because we're friends, but just cause it's boring to read sarcastic posts about people for no reason at all. it just gets really old.
back to the subject, go features! this makes me so very happy.
maybe i could sing along
to your neverending songs,
i'm just looking for some fun
Posted  Thursday, January 20, 2005 at 8:07 AM
Post 11 of 140
hot damn i'm taping this.

even if jimmy kimmel's show is awful... ug.

any word on what song (or songS?!) they'll be playing?
Posted  Thursday, January 20, 2005 at 9:15 AM
Post 12 of 140
This is great news!
Posted  Thursday, January 20, 2005 at 2:45 PM
Post 13 of 140
stopforme's talking about jimmy kimmel.
it's a whole culture
Posted  Thursday, January 20, 2005 at 3:03 PM
Post 14 of 140
"Quote from garygarygary on Jan. 20, 2005 at 2:45 PM"
stopforme's talking about jimmy kimmel.
I see how you could be right, after re-reading it just now. Perhaps I still have a chip on my shoulder from our first message board "meeting" biggrin.gif. My apologies, it just seems this place is often full of personal attacks so that's the mindset whenever I read certain things.
Posted  Thursday, January 20, 2005 at 3:15 PM
Post 15 of 140
i once saw jimmy kimmel make fun of a man's hairplugs (regular guy, not a celebrity) to his face on the show. the guy was clearly humiliated. so fuck him.

also, adam on xplay made a joke about jfk getting shot.

i love tv, but has anyone noticed that people are starting to cross real lines lately? or am i just getting old? making fun of celebrities is funny (did anyone see kathy griffin on the red carpet at the golden globes?), making fun of non-celebrities to their faces on national tv is not.
oh the drudgery of being wet
Posted  Thursday, January 20, 2005 at 4:43 PM
Post 16 of 140
"Quote from michael on Jan. 20, 2005 at 1:20 AM"
I think the guy that books for Conan (that is from Nashville) probably doesn't want to look like he is playing favorites.
Isn't that the music business in a nutshell, though? I'll refrain from bringing KoL/BYOP back up at this point.

Anyway, yes, I see your point, but that hasn't stopped him from putting Lambchop, John Davis, or other locals on recently.
I TOTALLY AGREE!


Keith, you are destined to rock. Never forget this.
-SLACK

Posted  Thursday, January 20, 2005 at 4:43 PM
Post 17 of 140
"Quote from joeywade on Jan. 20, 2005 at 4:03 PM"
"Quote from garygarygary on Jan. 20, 2005 at 2:45 PM"
stopforme's talking about jimmy kimmel.
I see how you could be right, after re-reading it just now. Perhaps I still have a chip on my shoulder from our first message board "meeting" biggrin.gif. My apologies, it just seems this place is often full of personal attacks so that's the mindset whenever I read certain things.
I'm confused. What difference does it make to whom she was directing her comment towards (Conan's booking guy or Jimmy Kimmel)? It's still a "personal attack". How does that change your assement?
Daigle is all we need to make the night complete
Posted  Thursday, January 20, 2005 at 4:44 PM
Post 18 of 140
"Quote from Keith on Jan. 20, 2005 at 5:43 PM"
"Quote from michael on Jan. 20, 2005 at 1:20 AM"
I think the guy that books for Conan (that is from Nashville) probably doesn't want to look like he is playing favorites.
Isn't that the music business in a nutshell, though? I'll refrain from bringing KoL/BYOP back up at this point.
Do you understand what the word "refrain" means?
Daigle is all we need to make the night complete
Posted  Thursday, January 20, 2005 at 4:46 PM
Post 19 of 140
"Quote from carligula on Jan. 20, 2005 at 5:44 PM"
"Quote from Keith on Jan. 20, 2005 at 5:43 PM"
"Quote from michael on Jan. 20, 2005 at 1:20 AM"
I think the guy that books for Conan (that is from Nashville) probably doesn't want to look like he is playing favorites.
Isn't that the music business in a nutshell, though? I'll refrain from bringing KoL/BYOP back up at this point.
Do you understand what the word "refrain" means?
Do you understand what the word "irony" means?
I TOTALLY AGREE!


Keith, you are destined to rock. Never forget this.
-SLACK

Posted  Thursday, January 20, 2005 at 5:02 PM
Post 20 of 140
"Quote from Keith on Jan. 20, 2005 at 5:46 PM"
"Quote from carligula on Jan. 20, 2005 at 5:44 PM"
"Quote from Keith on Jan. 20, 2005 at 5:43 PM"
"Quote from michael on Jan. 20, 2005 at 1:20 AM"
I think the guy that books for Conan (that is from Nashville) probably doesn't want to look like he is playing favorites.
Isn't that the music business in a nutshell, though? I'll refrain from bringing KoL/BYOP back up at this point.
Do you understand what the word "refrain" means?
Do you understand what the word "irony" means?
Does anyone?
Daigle is all we need to make the night complete
Posted  Thursday, January 20, 2005 at 5:32 PM
Post 21 of 140
"Quote from carligula on Jan. 20, 2005 at 4:43 PM"
"Quote from joeywade on Jan. 20, 2005 at 4:03 PM"
"Quote from garygarygary on Jan. 20, 2005 at 2:45 PM"
stopforme's talking about jimmy kimmel.
I see how you could be right, after re-reading it just now. Perhaps I still have a chip on my shoulder from our first message board "meeting" biggrin.gif. My apologies, it just seems this place is often full of personal attacks so that's the mindset whenever I read certain things.
I'm confused. What difference does it make to whom she was directing her comment towards (Conan's booking guy or Jimmy Kimmel)? It's still a "personal attack". How does that change your assement?
It isn't a direct personal attack, and like stopforme said, its ok to make fun of celebrities. Not only is it ok, but fun. Closer to topic, Jimmy Kimmel's show isn't nearly as funny as the others, but I do like his personality more than the rest. More than anything though, I'm just happy to see the band on national TV.
Posted  Thursday, January 20, 2005 at 6:44 PM
Post 22 of 140
"Quote from stopforme on Jan. 20, 2005 at 12:41 AM"
fuck that asshole
Does anyone seriously think she would've said this to joeywade? It's not like he's carl or something. Plus, I totally agree- Jimmy Kimmel is a cocksucker. But I'm glad he's hired someone with taste.
Two sips from the cup of human kindness and I'm shitfaced
Posted  Thursday, January 20, 2005 at 6:52 PM
Post 23 of 140
"Quote from Keith on Jan. 20, 2005 at 4:43 PM"
"Quote from michael on Jan. 20, 2005 at 1:20 AM"
I think the guy that books for Conan (that is from Nashville) probably doesn't want to look like he is playing favorites.
Isn't that the music business in a nutshell, though? I'll refrain from bringing KoL/BYOP back up at this point.

Anyway, yes, I see your point, but that hasn't stopped him from putting Lambchop, John Davis, or other locals on recently.
i totally agree
oh the drudgery of being wet
Posted  Thursday, January 20, 2005 at 7:01 PM
Post 24 of 140
Lovely, it wasn't even a full page before this thread went off topic. Bravo, guys.
Posted  Thursday, January 20, 2005 at 11:02 PM
Post 25 of 140
I'm really excited about the features playing on Jimmy Kimmel's show!!!!! but since I never watch it.... uh what channel does it air on channel 2?
Posted  Friday, January 21, 2005 at 7:57 AM
Post 26 of 140
"Quote from carligula on Jan. 20, 2005 at 5:02 PM"
"Quote from Keith on Jan. 20, 2005 at 5:46 PM"
"Quote from carligula on Jan. 20, 2005 at 5:44 PM"
"Quote from Keith on Jan. 20, 2005 at 5:43 PM"
"Quote from michael on Jan. 20, 2005 at 1:20 AM"
I think the guy that books for Conan (that is from Nashville) probably doesn't want to look like he is playing favorites.
Isn't that the music business in a nutshell, though? I'll refrain from bringing KoL/BYOP back up at this point.
Do you understand what the word "refrain" means?
Do you understand what the word "irony" means?
Does anyone?
I can just see you guys- in the same house, using the same computer, taking turns typing things to each other. That's cute.
Posted  Friday, January 21, 2005 at 1:18 PM
Post 27 of 140
"Quote from foldsfan on Jan. 21, 2005 at 8:57 AM"
"Quote from carligula on Jan. 20, 2005 at 5:02 PM"
"Quote from Keith on Jan. 20, 2005 at 5:46 PM"
"Quote from carligula on Jan. 20, 2005 at 5:44 PM"
"Quote from Keith on Jan. 20, 2005 at 5:43 PM"
"Quote from michael on Jan. 20, 2005 at 1:20 AM"
I think the guy that books for Conan (that is from Nashville) probably doesn't want to look like he is playing favorites.
Isn't that the music business in a nutshell, though? I'll refrain from bringing KoL/BYOP back up at this point.
Do you understand what the word "refrain" means?
Do you understand what the word "irony" means?
Does anyone?
I can just see you guys- in the same house, using the same computer, taking turns typing things to each other. That's cute.
When we're in the house together, we don't use the computer because we can never keep our hands off one another.
Daigle is all we need to make the night complete
Posted  Friday, January 21, 2005 at 1:26 PM
Post 28 of 140
gay bomb strikes again?
Posted  Sunday, January 23, 2005 at 2:37 PM
Post 29 of 140
the universal records site says they'll be playing "blow it out"......
maybe i could sing along
to your neverending songs,
i'm just looking for some fun
Posted  Sunday, January 23, 2005 at 2:58 PM
Post 30 of 140
"Quote from featuresgirl on Jan. 23, 2005 at 2:37 PM"
the universal records site says they'll be playing "blow it out"......
um, that sucks.
oh the drudgery of being wet
Posted  Sunday, January 23, 2005 at 3:00 PM
Post 31 of 140
"Quote from stopforme on Jan. 20, 2005 at 3:15 PM"
i once saw jimmy kimmel make fun of a man's hairplugs (regular guy, not a celebrity) to his face on the show. the guy was clearly humiliated. so fuck him.
The guy with hair plugs is most likely Rick Rosner - he's one of Kimmel's writers. Rosner's a total fucking nut. He gets off on that kind of attention - it's all good natured.
"Sugar, Mr. Poon?"
"No, never, never... thank you."
Posted  Sunday, January 23, 2005 at 5:38 PM
Post 32 of 140
I am so excited. I cannot wait.

I assumed they would perform "Blow it Out". Even though that's the last song on the album I would choose for them to play, I'll still be thrilled.

biggrin.gif
But what will happen to the boy when the circus comes to town?
Posted  Monday, January 24, 2005 at 5:02 PM
Post 33 of 140
"Quote from Johnny Thunder on Jan. 23, 2005 at 3:00 PM"
"Quote from stopforme on Jan. 20, 2005 at 3:15 PM"
i once saw jimmy kimmel make fun of a man's hairplugs (regular guy, not a celebrity) to his face on the show.  the guy was clearly humiliated.  so fuck him.
The guy with hair plugs is most likely Rick Rosner - he's one of Kimmel's writers. Rosner's a total fucking nut. He gets off on that kind of attention - it's all good natured.
no, this was a guy off the street
oh the drudgery of being wet
Posted  Monday, January 24, 2005 at 5:23 PM
Post 34 of 140
"Quote from Sexy Sadie on Jan. 23, 2005 at 6:38 PM"
I am so excited. I cannot wait.

I assumed they would perform "Blow it Out". Even though that's the last song on the album I would choose for them to play, I'll still be thrilled.

biggrin.gif
according to roadie, they're playing two songs: "blow it out" and either "there's a million ways" or "the way it's meant to be". i cant' remember which one....don't take my word for it, though.... they might change their minds.
maybe i could sing along
to your neverending songs,
i'm just looking for some fun
Posted  Monday, January 24, 2005 at 8:43 PM
Post 35 of 140
"Quote from featuresgirl on Jan. 24, 2005 at 5:23 PM"
"Quote from Sexy Sadie on Jan. 23, 2005 at 6:38 PM"
I am so excited.  I cannot wait.

I assumed they would perform "Blow it Out".  Even though that's the last song on the album I would choose for them to play, I'll still be thrilled.  

biggrin.gif
according to roadie, they're playing two songs: "blow it out" and either "there's a million ways" or "the way it's meant to be". i cant' remember which one....don't take my word for it, though.... they might change their minds.
wait! i thought we werent supposed to disclose anything roadie tells us that may be suspect! dont jinx it!
oh the drudgery of being wet
Posted  Monday, January 24, 2005 at 9:38 PM
Post 36 of 140
I got an email from the promoter of the Jimmy Kimmel show and am passing it along to you guys (even though I am sure most of you will be unable to attend, maybe you know some LA people that need the info). It will be on the website news soon enough, I just didn't want to bump the KEXP thing down until it was over with...

----------

THE FEATURES,

Here’s an amazing opportunity to be a part of THE FEATURES live performance on JIMMY KIMMEL LIVE Wednesday, February 2nd.

If you are interested in being a part of the show, please visit www.1iota.com and click THE FEATURES event link. Then follow the simple registration directions.

ATTENDANCE TO THIS EVENT IS BY INVITATION ONLY!!!

Remember, BE QUICK, because space is EXTREMELY LIMITED!!

MUSTS:

·     YOU MUST BE AT LEAST 18 YEARS OLD

·     YOU MUST BE AVAILABLE ON WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 2nd FROM 6:00PM –9:00PM

·     YOU MUST HAVE A VALID PHOTO ID

·     PLEASE DO NOT WEAR WHITE, LIGHT BLUE, BIEGE OR LOGOS, AS THEY DON’T COME ACROSS WELL ON CAMERA

·     PLEASE DO NOT BRING LARGE HANDBAGS OR KNAPSACKS

·     NO CAMERAS OR RECORDING DEVICES



-----

A rewritten version of this will be on the site in the next few days.

I apologize if my posts brought us off topic.. my bad.


Michael
Posted  Monday, January 24, 2005 at 11:19 PM
Post 37 of 140
"Quote from michael on Jan. 24, 2005 at 10:38 PM"
I apologize if my posts brought us off topic.. my bad.


Michael
I'm sure folks blame you too; I know we never get off topic unless you bring us to that low, low point.

Will
being sarcastic, for the record; this thread seems to demand announcing such
You may like grandma's yard gnomes, but I've seen Rock City. Remember it.
Posted  Monday, January 24, 2005 at 11:43 PM
Post 38 of 140
Yes it's all Michael's fault!
Posted  Tuesday, January 25, 2005 at 10:03 PM
Post 39 of 140
OHHHHH YEAH.....

(Edited by 1millionthcustomer at 10:06 pm on Jan. 25, 2005)
Posted  Tuesday, January 25, 2005 at 10:30 PM
Post 40 of 140
Duff Man, is that really you?
Posted  Wednesday, February 2, 2005 at 10:55 AM
Post 41 of 140
Tonight's the night. Who's excited?
signature
Posted  Wednesday, February 2, 2005 at 10:57 AM
Post 42 of 140
"Quote from Bowl of Fire on Feb. 2, 2005 at 11:55 AM"
Tonight's the night. Who's excited?
I am! I am! Excited enough to stay up until 1am to see it!
Daigle is all we need to make the night complete
Posted  Wednesday, February 2, 2005 at 11:02 AM
Post 43 of 140
I am super excited! I have 2 T.V.s set up to tape it in my house, not to mention all of my friends that are taping it. I will definitely watch it "live", though. I wouldn't miss a chance to see Roger!
"negro frijoles!!" ~m.m.
Posted  Wednesday, February 2, 2005 at 2:58 PM
Post 44 of 140
"Quote from carligula on Feb. 2, 2005 at 10:57 AM"
"Quote from Bowl of Fire on Feb. 2, 2005 at 11:55 AM"
Tonight's the night.  Who's excited?
I am! I am! Excited enough to stay up until 1am to see it!
Why 1am? I have that it starts on ABC at 11:05 central.
I can't grow a beard, and I don't like to party.
~Matthew Tiberius Pelham
Posted  Wednesday, February 2, 2005 at 3:26 PM
Post 45 of 140
I think it's 12:05, or 12:15, some odd time, but definitely after midnight according to Yahoo TV listings for Comcast Nashville.
Posted  Wednesday, February 2, 2005 at 3:44 PM
Post 46 of 140
"Quote from BrianW on Feb. 2, 2005 at 4:26 PM"
I think it's 12:05, or 12:15, some odd time, but definitely after midnight according to Yahoo TV listings for Comcast Nashville.
That's because WKRN thinks an hour of Friends reruns is more important than late night talkshows. Maybe they don't like to compete with Letterman, Leno, and Conan.
Daigle is all we need to make the night complete
Posted  Wednesday, February 2, 2005 at 4:16 PM
Post 47 of 140
i'm mighty excited... got the VCR all ready to record (after i couldn't figure it out last night in time to record the arcade fire on conan... arg!).

so... another late night of watching the tv, ready to pounce on the record button, i guess.

i've never watched jimmy kimmel's show... is it any good? from what i remember, it was pretty terrible. but hey... i'll suffer for a night.
Posted  Wednesday, February 2, 2005 at 6:34 PM
Post 48 of 140
Jeez, can someone (anyone?) record this show and rip a decent file of it for upload on the Internet? I'm pretty sure this is past my bedtime but I'd love to see it...national TV! Crazy.
Posted  Wednesday, February 2, 2005 at 6:44 PM
Post 49 of 140
Yeah I don't find Kimmel funny either...

I'll be sufferin' with ya..but god knows it's gonna be worth it! smile.gif
"Why are you wearing that bunny suit?"
>>"Why are you wearing that man suit?"
Posted  Wednesday, February 2, 2005 at 10:08 PM
Post 50 of 140
"Quote from Jakob Dorof on Feb. 2, 2005 at 6:34 PM"
Jeez, can someone (anyone?) record this show and rip a decent file of it for upload on the Internet? I'm pretty sure this is past my bedtime but I'd love to see it...national TV! Crazy.
I got tivo on my computer so if I can get it converted to mp3 it should sound nearly perfect. I'll see what I can do.


Ok, I got mp3's made . . .

(Edited by joeywade at 1:29 am on Feb. 3, 2005)
Posted  Wednesday, February 2, 2005 at 11:47 PM
Post 51 of 140
what the hell is going on? nightline after an hour of "friends"? eh? i want the features!!
tell me facts tell me facts tell me facts
tell me facts throw your arms around me
Posted  Thursday, February 3, 2005 at 12:09 AM
Post 52 of 140
Wow, a new set for JK... pretty sweet.
Posted  Thursday, February 3, 2005 at 12:21 AM
Post 53 of 140
I just saw the Features Kimmel performance here in Richmond, VA... It sounds like it hasn't aired in Nashville yet. I'm excited for the band. I bet when they wrote those songs 2 or 3 years ago, they never thought they'd play them on national TV.
PS - Watch for Rollum dropping his stick as soon as he comes in on the first song.
Posted  Thursday, February 3, 2005 at 12:47 AM
Post 54 of 140
so it is two songs???
Posted  Thursday, February 3, 2005 at 1:03 AM
Post 55 of 140
uh...i only heard/saw the way its meant to be!
oh....wait for it....
well there we go! blow it out.
very interesting. and surreal. and that was A LOT of matt's face. in fact i dont ever recall seeing so much of matt's face filling my point of view.
the front row knew the words. good for those 6.
im so proud of our band. really.
fantastic!

(Edited by SuperElk at 1:10 am on Feb. 3, 2005)
I wanna offended no persons!
Posted  Thursday, February 3, 2005 at 1:42 AM
Post 56 of 140
Awesome! The wait after watching Jimmy Kimmel and Jesse the Body rant finally ended. They looked nervous but a good performance. I finally got both of what will hopefully turn in to many more television appearances.
Posted  Thursday, February 3, 2005 at 1:50 AM
Post 57 of 140
Well, that was simply amazing. I was so glad that they decided to play "The Way It's Meant To Be" as the first song since it is so much better than "Blow It Out." Amazing performance. I feel so proud...first Kimmel, next the world.

And add the Features to that dude from Tennessee named BJ Hickman who quit his job and dropped out of high school to support Michael Jackson during trial and TN was well represented tonight.
~Digsy S. Slattery

My New York City Exploits
Posted  Thursday, February 3, 2005 at 1:56 AM
Post 58 of 140
ugh, Tivo quit recording exactly at 1:00 and I missed getting the video for Blow It Out. I was able to snag mp3's of both however.


It is very surreal to watch a band go from doing shows for 30 people to watching them play on national television. They sounded VERY good.
Posted  Thursday, February 3, 2005 at 6:13 AM
Post 59 of 140
"Quote from SuperElk on Feb. 3, 2005 at 1:03 AM"
uh...i only heard/saw the way its meant to be!
oh....wait for it....
well there we go! blow it out.
very interesting. and surreal. and that was A LOT of matt's face. in fact i dont ever recall seeing so much of matt's face filling my point of view.
the front row knew the words. good for those 6.
im so proud of our band. really.
fantastic!
The people singing was Mac Burrus of Self fame and Rebecca (Matt Mahffeys wife).....good to see all familiar faces .
Posted  Thursday, February 3, 2005 at 6:44 AM
Post 60 of 140
I set my VCR and just watched this morning. How excellent! Boy, am I glad I slept instead...not because the show wasn't good, but just because I'm tired as it is. I would've played different songs, but that discussion has been exhausted, so I won't go any further. Cheers for the Features!
I can't grow a beard, and I don't like to party.
~Matthew Tiberius Pelham
Posted  Thursday, February 3, 2005 at 6:50 AM
Post 61 of 140
Yay! This made my evening. The Features sounded great! Next time, I'm sure we will see them on Letterman. Kimmel just isn't my cup of tea, but it was so exciting seeing the band on television. Congratulations guys! biggrin.gif
"Look at that lip. Gonna bite it."
Posted  Thursday, February 3, 2005 at 7:52 AM
Post 62 of 140
i got a pretty good taping of both songs, if someone in murfreesboro has the know-how to get it on the computer i could get the tape to them..

great performance! heh, i re-watched it this morning and caught rollum's sticks... dropped one, picked up two, had to drop another... funny. nervous energy, i guess. honestly, the band setup/sound/camera angles were better than on most other talk shows.. got to see a nice amount of everyone, though it is a lot of matt. roger's beard has come along nicely. they definetly seemed a little nervous... the first half of twimtb was a little tame, then they looked a little more comfortable.

it was a little strange to be watching a band that i've seen in a place as tiny as the red rose on tv...

conan next, perhaps?? letterman would have more viewers, but i think conan's followers would be more apt to be into the music and possibly buy the record.
Posted  Thursday, February 3, 2005 at 8:35 AM
Post 63 of 140
yay! that was so surreal! i still can't believe they were on tv!!! i mean, it was exciting when they were on mtv2, but this is totally different. People without cable could watch! I had to watch the mtv2 show taped, so it was much more fun to watch them "live." They looked so hot and sounded so awesome! And the panda on Rollum's drum was such a cute shout-out to Katie. Yay! I am so proud of them!!! biggrin.gif
"negro frijoles!!" ~m.m.
Posted  Thursday, February 3, 2005 at 8:43 AM
Post 64 of 140
I liked that they prefaced the songs with their titles, and promoted the album before the commercial break. It sounds like they actually care about exposing new music these days, which is very cool. They had the music to The Way it's Meant to Be (sans vocals) playing before the commercial as well. Those 10 minutes on TV are going to be hugely beneficial to their exposure, I'm sure.
signature
Posted  Thursday, February 3, 2005 at 8:58 AM
Post 65 of 140
O, Happy Day!

O, happy, joyous day!!!!


bp



PS - They rocked, did they not?
"I Forgot!


...that armed robbery was illegal."


-Steve Martin
Posted  Thursday, February 3, 2005 at 9:09 AM
Post 66 of 140
"Quote from Billy Pilgrim on Feb. 3, 2005 at 8:58 AM"
PS - They rocked, did they not?
rock they did.
Posted  Thursday, February 3, 2005 at 9:34 AM
Post 67 of 140
Oh man, that was so freakin' cool! I liked how they kept showing people singing along in the audience -- just like a "real" Features show ;-)

The Features look GREAT on TV -- their wonderul lack of pretension came across. They don't put on some kind of stage persona, they just rock it out, which makes them so much more fun to watch.

I agree that the camera work was better than these things usually are -- on Letterman, it's just all about the lead singer all the time. And I was impressed about the fact that they got 2 songs and there was that little message about where to go buy the CD right now. I'm not a big fan of Kimmel, but he does a better job at the "musical guest" than the other shows, I think.

AND I was so excited when they played "Blow It Out" -- I know y'all don't love it, but it's one of my faves and I will defend it til the day I die!

Melinda (the KY one)
Posted  Thursday, February 3, 2005 at 9:39 AM
Post 68 of 140
Question for JoeyWade - what are you using to pull the mp3's from your tivo recording? I've been looking for something to rip the audio out of .tivo files. Thanks in advance.
Posted  Thursday, February 3, 2005 at 10:00 AM
Post 69 of 140
>The Features look GREAT on TV -- their wonderul lack of pretension came
>across.



Yeah, wasn't that crazy? I thought it was shocking how telegenic they were. Not that they're ugly guys or anything, but hey. They took over that TV screen big-time.

My first impression was just how unique they must've looked to your average music fan. They didn't just go... BAM!!! And stay loud the rest of the time, they came in with shakers (it almost look choreographed, but of course we know better) and it just looked very different. In a very cool way.

Again, shocked. "Shocked to find gambling here!"


>They don't put on some kind of stage persona, they just rock it out, which
>makes them so much more fun to watch.

Doesn't it, though? They were basically loose-- a little nervous, but still... considering it's their first time on network television, they seemed pretty relaxed.


Did I mention they rocked?

~{8^>)

bp

PS - sorry if this quoting method ( the ">"'s) isn't used around here, but I can't help myself. Lemme know if I need to knock it off.
"I Forgot!


...that armed robbery was illegal."


-Steve Martin
Posted  Thursday, February 3, 2005 at 10:18 AM
Post 70 of 140
"Quote from avalanche on Feb. 3, 2005 at 7:13 AM"
The people singing was Mac Burrus of Self fame and Rebecca (Matt Mahffeys wife).....good to see all familiar faces .
Also singing was Shannon Slack (by the way...way to go with that one, Nick!).

What an experience watching them on TV. I'll admit, after 5 or 6 years following the band, and seeing them a million times, I had gotten somewhat unexcited about The Features. Of course I still think they're an awesome band, but I felt like there were no surprises left for me. Even when I heard they were going to be on TV, I was just like "well, that's cool I guess." But actually seeing it was an awesome, emotional experience. I'm just so proud, especially for Rollum who I had a chance to get to know a lot better over the last couple years when I had the extremely fortunate opportunity to play with him. I'm perhaps a tiny bit jealous, but there is no band that exists today that I would rather see "make it" at the level The Features are approaching. I've just become so jaded, seeing amazing bands almost make it that it is surreal to me that one of them just may be. My excitement is restored, and so is my faith. Go Features go!
I TOTALLY AGREE!


Keith, you are destined to rock. Never forget this.
-SLACK

Posted  Thursday, February 3, 2005 at 10:56 AM
Post 71 of 140
"Quote from jt30605 on Feb. 3, 2005 at 9:39 AM"
Question for JoeyWade - what are you using to pull the mp3's from your tivo recording? I've been looking for something to rip the audio out of .tivo files. Thanks in advance.
Well, its not actually tivo... my videocard came with a proram that's very simillar. When the Features started playing I was recording it with both my tivo-like program and windows sound recorder. So I just converted that to an mp3.
Posted  Thursday, February 3, 2005 at 12:04 PM
Post 72 of 140
i have .avi files of both performances...
Posted  Thursday, February 3, 2005 at 12:26 PM
Post 73 of 140
Unfortunately, they apparently don't air the Jimmy Kimmel show where I live, so I stayed up until twelve to see entertainment tonight. That was extremely disappointing. Hopefully I'll get access to the performance at some point, but I'm glad to hear that everyone was impressed. Wished I could have seen it.
Why would you do that?
Posted  Thursday, February 3, 2005 at 12:56 PM
Post 74 of 140
I wonder if this lovely website might host the video clips from the show at some point.

that would be lovely for us UK fans.

smile.gif

Oh, and come play in London again... I haven't seen The Features in, like, a month or two!
...and this ain't one of them...
Posted  Thursday, February 3, 2005 at 1:54 PM
Post 75 of 140
How big are the files? I have space and bandwith to waste. If they're too big, we could set up a torrent or some such equivalent.

~rachel whose cable went off due to ice storms just in time to miss it
Posted  Thursday, February 3, 2005 at 3:18 PM
Post 76 of 140
"Quote from Racharoo on Feb. 3, 2005 at 1:54 PM"
How big are the files? I have space and bandwith to waste. If they're too big, we could set up a torrent or some such equivalent.
about 54mb apiece. I recorded it on my roomates computer and transferred it to mine. (i'm always open for anyone to share anything with me as well hinthint!?!? )
Posted  Thursday, February 3, 2005 at 6:05 PM
Post 77 of 140
"Quote from Keith on Feb. 3, 2005 at 10:18 AM"
"Quote from avalanche on Feb. 3, 2005 at 7:13 AM"
The people singing was Mac Burrus of Self fame and Rebecca (Matt Mahffeys wife).....good to see all familiar faces .
Also singing was Shannon Slack (by the way...way to go with that one, Nick!).
were either of these the platnum blonde? because i have a huge girl crush on her
oh the drudgery of being wet
Posted  Thursday, February 3, 2005 at 6:06 PM
Post 78 of 140
You ever checked out www.yousendit.com?

Basically it's a place to let you upload files (up to 1 gig) because you won't be able to pass them via email. Has worked great for several friends of mine.. might be appropriate to use in this case.

I'll have to talk to management about the Jimmy Kimmel thing being added to the site.. not sure if we can do that through some sort of broadcast legality whatchamacallit. The Features vs ABC probably wouldn't be a pretty site.. of course that's a bit extreme .. but you get my drift.

Anyway.. I digress. You Send It might be the cure.



Michael
Posted  Thursday, February 3, 2005 at 8:09 PM
Post 79 of 140
Thanks JoeyWade. The search continues. I have some Austin City Limits .tivo recordings that I want the sound out of.
Posted  Thursday, February 3, 2005 at 9:02 PM
Post 80 of 140
I stayed up and recorded this tonight on the same tape as "Project Runway"

It was fun to see, I thought it got off to a slow start, but did pick up at the end

Roger was looking very cute, I thought

I saw Shannon (the pretty blonde) and my friend Blake singing along.

Happy.
That's so NA.
Posted  Thursday, February 3, 2005 at 9:04 PM
Post 81 of 140
Okay. I just watched the tape Yadadada recorded last night. Of course, everyone's already expressed this, but how freakin' awesome was it to see The Features on ABC? What a great performance -- not the best I've seen from the guys, but made exceptionally glorious by the fact that they were on national television. I don't know how this whole thing works, exactly, but I sense this is a step in the right direction and I hope that it helps them to sell lots of records...or at least get played on the O.C.
Posted  Thursday, February 3, 2005 at 10:19 PM
Post 82 of 140
"Quote from xmelinda on Feb. 3, 2005 at 9:34 AM"
AND I was so excited when they played "Blow It Out" -- I know y'all don't love it, but it's one of my faves and I will defend it til the day I die!
I love it too! It just makes we wanna bouce!

The show was awesome! I was excited just to see their names on the info screen. How cool. Way to go guys!
Posted  Friday, February 4, 2005 at 12:18 AM
Post 83 of 140

I haven't been so excited for the Features in a long time!!! I thought it was so funny when matt hit a couple of wrong chords.. hehe, just nervous jitters I guess. My shitty ass cable is really staticy on the lower channels, so as soon as someone gets it uploaded somewhere, I want it!!!!
Posted  Friday, February 4, 2005 at 3:32 AM
Post 84 of 140
"Quote from avalanche on Feb. 3, 2005 at 6:13 AM"
The people singing was Mac Burrus of Self fame and Rebecca (Matt Mahffeys wife).....good to see all familiar faces .
Also, Mac used to sign in on the Selfies forums as "1millionthcustomer".

*checks halfway down page three*
...and this ain't one of them...
Posted  Friday, February 4, 2005 at 8:53 AM
Post 85 of 140
If you want me to put them on my server, holla at me. If you've got AIM that would probably be the best way for me to get them via their file transfer system.

aim: rockyhorrorrache

~rachel
Posted  Friday, February 4, 2005 at 11:32 AM
Post 86 of 140
I have a 48 MB edited version of the JKL appearance. It includes all parts of the show where The Features are mentioned. I'm more than happy to share it, but need to find some people to mirror, because I don't want you crazy people clobbering my server and forcing me to mortgage my house to pay for the bandwidth. wink.gif

Reply to this if you wanna mirror and I"ll hook you up.
Posted  Friday, February 4, 2005 at 12:20 PM
Post 87 of 140
edited to take my personal links out.

that's the way it's meant to be

blow it out

~rachel

(Edited by Racharoo at 9:14 am on Feb. 5, 2005)
Posted  Friday, February 4, 2005 at 1:36 PM
Post 88 of 140
thanks much, rachel.
Posted  Friday, February 4, 2005 at 3:00 PM
Post 89 of 140
"Quote from dontstaylong on Feb. 4, 2005 at 1:36 PM"
thanks much, rachel.
yes, it is extremely rare around here for someone to go out of their way to provide their "Features resources" without expecting something in return. Check your messages.
Posted  Friday, February 4, 2005 at 3:18 PM
Post 90 of 140
"Quote from joeywade on Feb. 4, 2005 at 4:00 PM"
"Quote from dontstaylong on Feb. 4, 2005 at 1:36 PM"
thanks much, rachel.
yes, it is extremely rare around here for someone to go out of their way to provide their "Features resources" without expecting something in return. Check your messages.
I think we've been over why some "Features resources" aren't exactly Public Features Board Domain... so I'm just gonna say "Sit on it, Joey"

And thanks Rachel for posting that.
Posted  Friday, February 4, 2005 at 3:28 PM
Post 91 of 140
Thanks Rachel.
Posted  Friday, February 4, 2005 at 4:09 PM
Post 92 of 140
"Quote from joeywade on Feb. 4, 2005 at 3:00 PM"
"Quote from dontstaylong on Feb. 4, 2005 at 1:36 PM"
thanks much, rachel.
yes, it is extremely rare around here for someone to go out of their way to provide their "Features resources" without expecting something in return. Check your messages.
Exactly the problem on this board. I would be more than willing to share any "Features resources" with nothing in return, but unfortunately on this board it doesn't work so much the other way around.
Posted  Friday, February 4, 2005 at 4:22 PM
Post 93 of 140
so.. i've got em downloaded to my computer at work, hoping i could email them to myself, and the files are too big.... arg. no internet at home, and no cd burner on this comp. so i've really got no way of getting these files home with me. damn. oh well.
Posted  Friday, February 4, 2005 at 6:26 PM
Post 94 of 140
I'll have the files on soulseek when I get back home this weekend. My name on there is somatiff.
Posted  Friday, February 4, 2005 at 11:32 PM
Post 95 of 140
"Quote from Peace Frog on Feb. 4, 2005 at 3:18 PM"
"Quote from joeywade on Feb. 4, 2005 at 4:00 PM"
"Quote from dontstaylong on Feb. 4, 2005 at 1:36 PM"
thanks much, rachel.
yes, it is extremely rare around here for someone to go out of their way to provide their "Features resources" without expecting something in return. Check your messages.
I think we've been over why some "Features resources" aren't exactly Public Features Board Domain... so I'm just gonna say "Sit on it, Joey"
I'm not talking about anything other than shows. I completely understand why studio versions, unreleased videos, and the like shouldn't be passed out like halloween candy. My comments are entirely directed at people who get greedy with their recorded shows- ESPECIALLY with the newbies. And I guess that's their right- it is theirs afterall. Perfect examples are the cd release party and the acoustic show at Grimey's.


Anyway, I'm not pissed off or anything, it was just an observation. Okay, I'm sitting...
Posted  Saturday, February 5, 2005 at 9:20 AM
Post 96 of 140
no problemo dudes and dudettes. I was never cool enough to be elite. I could never get that scowling expression down.

smile.gif

~rachel
Posted  Saturday, February 5, 2005 at 2:34 PM
Post 97 of 140
As a person who once wanted recordings of Features shows, I know how it is to feel deprived of them. Since I had a strong desire to hear the newest material, I took it upon myself to buy the equipment necessary for recording. The Features never seemed to have much of a problem with anyone recording their shows. Thus, my problem was remedied. I never once felt like I was entitled to receive certain shows from people that had them. On the contrary, I did know that I could trade my recordings for ones that I wanted. Ask anyone who has ever bartered and they will outline the same system of thought.

I feel that it is no obligation of any individual to share a show if they have no desire to do such.

Personally, I can only see one reason why anyone would want a recording of the Features album release show. They didn't play anything out of the ordinary. The sound comes off like a show at Municipal Auditorium. From what I can recall, I maybe listened to that show twice after it was performed. The only special dynamic of that show is the context surrounding it. The context being that it was the release show. The same reason that a person would want it, is the same reason that someone recorded it. It has historical significance to certain persons. Since my personal demand was to have a copy of that show, I made a personal choice to supply myself with the equipment needed to satiate my demands. To my knowledge, only one other person did this. Did only two people want this show? I would surely doubt it. If someone wanted this show, why didn't they take it upon themselves to record it? If I really want something, I get it myself. It is not someone else's obligation to get it for me and then pass it along to me. If they do, that is great; but, if they don't, it's not my place to feel entitled to it. As a person who is proactive towards their desires, I find it quite ridiculous to make this a scenario where I am somehow obligated to help you satisfy your desires. Pretend that Blightman and I do not exist. Who is now obligated to provide you with this show?

Your comment about greed is a bit off-base. My life has been reshuffled since the time when making, gifting, and trading live recordings was a priority of mine. Instead of "greedy", I would say that I am simply too occupied with new priorities. I would appreciate it if you would stop making presumptuous comments about me and anyone else. Just because the recordings are not being circulated, you automatically presume that I am too greedy to relay them. It is not your place to speculate. Just pretend that I don't exist. It's almost like I am the person who has crack, and you want crack. Only, I am no longer a drug dealer. Why must I give you my own crack smoke? There is no obligation. Period.

(Edited by richarddawson at 3:38 pm on Feb. 5, 2005)
Posted  Saturday, February 5, 2005 at 5:32 PM
Post 98 of 140
RD is right (let's forget my whole trading union back in the day and the general message behind it; I sort of forget, myself, anyway). While I think B&P and 2:1 trades can be a nice thing for the wealthy trader to do for the ones just starting out, it STILL is a huge favor on the part of the trader with the desired material...and anyone taking advantage of that has to realize what they're doing. That's why a general rule for my old site was that people could decline requests for B&P/2:1 trades if they felt like it. If you're just too busy to help a fellow fan out, you're just too busy.

Still, while RD also makes a good point about getting up and doing something about it yourself, that's not always possible for everyone. From what I gather, RD and most others in the "international trading community" records their shows via a device called a Minidisc. Well, I've logged quite a few hours looking into Minidiscs and online, and frankly, there are so many of them with so many different features and subfunctions, it's hard to understand which is good for what and what kind of work it requires to properly use one. I'd love to record every Features show that comes by Philadelphia (granted that one of these days I can actually find the time/energy to get there), so long as it doesn't require some incredibly conspicuous act like plugging a cord into their mics and leaving my device onstage. But honestly, through all my searching, I haven't found one good description on how the hell to do get the right device and actually use it in a realistic manner (price is another issue, of course). Another nasty variable is that of proximity...I honestly don't think very many people who enjoy Middle Tennessee music realize just how lucky they are to have a relatively large number of excellent bands in such a relatively small area. I live in Philadelphia and while there definitely seems to be a wealth of bands here, they pretty much all freaking suck. I've found one that's excellent (that might be breaking up soon, it seems), but ironically the frontman from that band is from the south anyhow. There's a couple more that people seem to like a lot, but from what I've heard, they suck, too. Hence, I'm all about the Tennessee bootlegs...but I really don't have that many granted my interest in them. But now I'm getting off-topic.

I actually had been meaning to get in touch with you, RD, about how to best record these shows (sent you an email to some old address a while back, I think)...I don't have the money to burn right now, but for future reference, I'd love to know. Just tell me the name of whatever model of Minidisc/gear you use and I'll look into it more specifically myself...and maybe I'll have some exclusive Philadelphia Features bootlegs in the future. biggrin.gif
Posted  Saturday, February 5, 2005 at 5:58 PM
Post 99 of 140
I don't think that joey was referring to you as being greedy. I'm guessing its a reference of people who have had these recordings passed along to them and then don't care about sharing them with anyone else. You are certainly not obliged to share anything you have recorded with anyone, but the Features were also not obligated to allow these recordings to take place. The Features were cool enough to allow this, and I think it would be really cool if they were shared by people who recorded them or obtained them (such as on the Self page). I think that would be awesome.

Richard, you posed the question of why someone wouldn't just go out and record these themselves. I can think of 2 reaons off the bat other than knowing nothing or being too lazy to get a good recording device. I was born in Murfreesboro and lived there 18 years. Most of the clubs in town have age restriction, 18, on getting in. Since then, I've only gotten to see them play once , which was at The Boro in early August. It was indeed an awesome show, I even met Matt Mahaffey there. My other reason for not recording is that now I go to school in Austin, TX. It is hard for me to go to a show in Nashville when I am almost 900 miles away, but that doesnt mean I wouldn't love to be able to hear the shows however. In other words if you are lucky enough to get the 'crack', and you tell some crackheads about the crack. You can't expect to not have some crackheads banging on your door at 3am every once in a while.

All I'm saying is that it would be cool if yourself or someone like you was more willing to share recordings than the few who are. But if you have them, talk about them, but aren't willing to share any of them, then that gets pretty annoying and redundant. I also don't see keeping these and saying they are yours in any way. I think essentially they belong to the band for playing and allowing their shows to be recorded. So if there is anyone who IS willing to share and stuff, then that is awesome and let me know.
Posted  Saturday, February 5, 2005 at 6:30 PM
Post 100 of 140
Because I am so awesome, I am sharing this with you, my people. I may post the release show if a)I don't get back to being lazy and b)The Features camp doesn't get pissed at me for posting this stuff. I'm not really sure if this is allowed, honestly. Anyway, enjoy...

www.keithlowen.com/features.html (should be up by the time you read this).

P.S. Feel free to thank me personally on Valentine's Day. I'll be at The End.

(Edited by Keith at 7:33 pm on Feb. 5, 2005)
I TOTALLY AGREE!


Keith, you are destined to rock. Never forget this.
-SLACK

Posted  Saturday, February 5, 2005 at 7:09 PM
Post 101 of 140
That's so awesome, Keith...thanks a crapton!!
Posted  Saturday, February 5, 2005 at 8:31 PM
Post 102 of 140
Thanks. I'll see you on the 14th.
So I'm Hooking up with David Dewese David Dewese, double D Hooking up with DD DD, don't make me say please again oh no again oh no
Posted  Saturday, February 5, 2005 at 8:51 PM
Post 103 of 140
Keith, YOU ROCK.
Posted  Saturday, February 5, 2005 at 9:56 PM
Post 104 of 140
The reason that I would want the CD release show is for Mosis Ptosis, which I have only heard live since its debut. If anyone has any bootlegs with Mosis Ptosis, Arcata, or any of the other newer songs on it, then I will gladly trade a VHS copy of the 2.5 Features concerts I have videotaped. The concerts are the March 2003 Red Rose show (IBL opened), January 04 Inferno Bar show (featuring the most rocking Pelham performance I've ever seen), and half of the April/May 2004 MTSU Knoll show (I stopped because my battery ran low or something). I don't know if the right people would be interested in this or not, but it's worth a shot.

And Keith, you do not understand how much joy your gift has crammed into my heart. I've been meaning to arrange some sort of trade for that bootleg ever since September but I never got around to it. Thanks a million!
~Digsy S. Slattery

My New York City Exploits
Posted  Saturday, February 5, 2005 at 10:35 PM
Post 105 of 140
I'd gladly do a trade (even a no-hassle MP3 style one like Keith has posted) for some Features bootlegs. I've got some great pre-new millenium stuff that I doubt many/any other people have, including one that may even pre-date their Spongebath days, so hit me up via PM or jakob.dorof@gmail.com and we can work something out...

I like how this thread has become the bootleg personals section of the board. biggrin.gif

(Edited by Jakob Dorof at 10:36 pm on Feb. 5, 2005)
Posted  Saturday, February 5, 2005 at 11:21 PM
Post 106 of 140
First off, thanks a million Keith. It means a lot... honestly.


As for the whole "greedy" comment. I guess it struck a chord with a few people. It wasn't meant to piss anyone off, it wasn't directed at any one person, and it honestly isn't that big of a deal to me. I haven't lost any sleep over the bootlegs I don't have. But it does kind of irk me when newbies are looking for bootlegs and we pretend like there aren't any out there (knowing good and well that 90% of us have at least 2 or 3 shows at our disposal).

I agree with you RD on many of the comments you make. However there are really a ton of factors that go into someone wanting a bootleg. As for me, I assure you I'd be right up there recording with you guys if I had the $$$ for equipment and the know how to "master" it on the computer. Aside from that, I just now turned 21 and havn't been able to get in to many shows.

I am very well aware of how much trouble you put into obtaining your recordings, and am sure those people you have shared them with are very grateful. It is your right to do with them as you please, and I stated that in my original post. As MoreLikeVernie stated, it is directed at those of us who have gotten a ton of freebies (which I believe would apply to most of us long-time members) and kept them to ourselves like we've done something to earn them.

(Edited by joeywade at 11:52 pm on Feb. 5, 2005)
Posted  Saturday, February 5, 2005 at 11:47 PM
Post 107 of 140
"Quote from MoreLikeVernie on Feb. 5, 2005 at 6:58 PM"
Richard, you posed the question of why someone wouldn't just go out and record these themselves.  I can think of 2 reaons off the bat other than knowing nothing or being too lazy to get a good recording device.

I had to teach myself how to bootleg.

"Quote from MoreLikeVernie on Feb. 5, 2005 at 6:58 PM"
In other words if you are lucky enough to get the 'crack', and you tell some crackheads about the crack.  You can't expect to not have some crackheads banging on your door at 3am every once in a while.
I didn't tell the crackheads about it. They were simply aware that I recorded it.

"Quote from MoreLikeVernie on Feb. 5, 2005 at 6:58 PM"
But if you have them, talk about them, but aren't willing to share any of them, then that gets pretty annoying and redundant.  I also don't see keeping these and saying they are yours in any way.  I think essentially they belong to the band for playing and allowing their shows to be recorded.  So if there is anyone who IS willing to share and stuff, then that is awesome and let me know.
I didn't post in this topic to "dangle the merchandise". I posted only to clarify that I am not being greedy. The fact that the music belongs to the band has never been in question. By not circulating a show, I am making no strides in personal gain. As for being annoying and redundant, so is this topic. Thanks to Keith for posting our recording of the Grimey's show. It's not of the best quality, though.
Posted  Sunday, February 6, 2005 at 2:00 AM
Post 108 of 140
I'll trade all of my acquired bootlegs to anyone, anytime. As long as you are hot and agree to meet me in a private, discrete location. It's all for the love of the music. I like to dangle my merchandise; blink.gif
Posted  Sunday, February 6, 2005 at 12:13 PM
Post 109 of 140
"Quote from richarddawson on Feb. 6, 2005 at 12:47 AM"
I posted only to clarify that I am not being greedy.
Frankly Dick, there is no reason for you to even have to do that. Your generousity has been well documented in the past. The fact that you don't have the time, energy or desire to be the bootleg fairy does not reflect any fault of your own. The first time I met you, you gave me a Features bootleg (after the two of us had been involved in several unfriendly discussions on this message board), and I know I'm not the only person you've done this for.
I am a horse with no name.
Posted  Sunday, February 6, 2005 at 1:18 PM
Post 110 of 140
hey richarddawson and i have had our disagreements boardwise in the past...where is my f-in bottleg?
I wanna offended no persons!
Posted  Sunday, February 6, 2005 at 1:23 PM
Post 111 of 140
i have a lot of dave matthews band bootlegs if anyone wants to trade.
oh the drudgery of being wet
Posted  Sunday, February 6, 2005 at 1:26 PM
Post 112 of 140
i watched and i cried, happy tears of course.

i miss you sad.gif
i let the melody shine
let it cleanse my mind
i feel free now.
Posted  Sunday, February 6, 2005 at 1:47 PM
Post 113 of 140
"Quote from MoreLikeVernie on Feb. 5, 2005 at 6:58 PM"
I don't think that joey was referring to you as being greedy. I'm guessing its a reference of people who have had these recordings passed along to them and then don't care about sharing them with anyone else. You are certainly not obliged to share anything you have recorded with anyone, but the Features were also not obligated to allow these recordings to take place. The Features were cool enough to allow this, and I think it would be really cool if they were shared by people who recorded them or obtained them (such as on the Self page). I think that would be awesome.

Richard, you posed the question of why someone wouldn't just go out and record these themselves. I can think of 2 reaons off the bat other than knowing nothing or being too lazy to get a good recording device. I was born in Murfreesboro and lived there 18 years. Most of the clubs in town have age restriction, 18, on getting in. Since then, I've only gotten to see them play once , which was at The Boro in early August. It was indeed an awesome show, I even met Matt Mahaffey there. My other reason for not recording is that now I go to school in Austin, TX. It is hard for me to go to a show in Nashville when I am almost 900 miles away, but that doesnt mean I wouldn't love to be able to hear the shows however. In other words if you are lucky enough to get the 'crack', and you tell some crackheads about the crack. You can't expect to not have some crackheads banging on your door at 3am every once in a while.

All I'm saying is that it would be cool if yourself or someone like you was more willing to share recordings than the few who are. But if you have them, talk about them, but aren't willing to share any of them, then that gets pretty annoying and redundant. I also don't see keeping these and saying they are yours in any way. I think essentially they belong to the band for playing and allowing their shows to be recorded. So if there is anyone who IS willing to share and stuff, then that is awesome and let me know.
Your understanding of the entire situation, and especially of the individual you're speaking out against, is so cursory and superficial as to be laughable. If, perhaps, you'd wait around here and get to know the board better than you do, you wouldn't go shooting your mouth off about things you aren't terribly familiar with.

RD's a busy man. For him to make boots for you and everyone that wanted them would be a pretty hefty part time job. Why should he? Contribute to the board and to the community, get to know him (even in only an online sense), and you'll become his friend. And he'd do anything for his friends.

You? You're someone that showed up and has made 10 posts, a large percentage of which are complaints that no one gives you anything. Hardly contribution and hardly a "friend."

Will
You may like grandma's yard gnomes, but I've seen Rock City. Remember it.
Posted  Sunday, February 6, 2005 at 3:25 PM
Post 114 of 140
"Quote"
RD's a busy man. For him to make boots for you and everyone that wanted them would be a pretty hefty part time job. Why should he? Contribute to the board and to the community, get to know him (even in only an online sense), and you'll become his friend. And he'd do anything for his friends.


Remember that one time, RD, that you helped me get that racoon family out of my plaid pants? That was awesome.
Posted  Sunday, February 6, 2005 at 4:36 PM
Post 115 of 140
"Quote from Wiyum on Feb. 6, 2005 at 1:47 PM"
Your understanding of the entire situation, and especially of the individual you're speaking out against, is so cursory and superficial as to be laughable. If, perhaps, you'd wait around here and get to know the board better than you do, you wouldn't go shooting your mouth off about things you aren't terribly familiar with.

RD's a busy man. For him to make boots for you and everyone that wanted them would be a pretty hefty part time job. Why should he? Contribute to the board and to the community, get to know him (even in only an online sense), and you'll become his friend. And he'd do anything for his friends.

You? You're someone that showed up and has made 10 posts, a large percentage of which are complaints that no one gives you anything. Hardly contribution and hardly a "friend."

Will
First of all, this is the only topic under which I openly made a complaint about anything. In this case the complaint had already been made however, and I was simply backing it up. I made an open invitation for anyone who had the time and resources to make more shows available, etc. Keith was a nice enough person to do that for everyone. If you're going to start taking shots at me for posting and ask people if they were willing to share any music they have, then you might as well take shots at half of the people on this board who have done the same. The fact that my comments are shallow and hasty, I think they were blount and to the point. Is there something wrong with openly asking people on a Features message board if they are open to sharing anything they have?

RD, i understand that you are busy, and I have never specifically asked you for anything, nor did I intend to. I think you missed the point I was getting across earlier. The reason I never got into making recordings is that I haven't been able to go to shows. I realize you have time and money invested into this project, and I am not one of the people who has gone out of my way to contact you about hooking me up with freebies. The fact that you have done that for people at all is pretty cool. I was simply backing up joey's earlier comment, in that I did not believe he was referencing you when he refered to people as greedy.

As for my 10 posts, I'm sure there's a decent percentage of people like me who simply read this forum a lot without posting. Like I said I've only complained once on this forum, because I agreed somewhat in what joey had to say. Maybe there are some people on this board who should act a bit "friendlier" to newbies who come on this forum and want to know or find out stuff about the band instead of trying to call them out for asking a simple question. I'm sorry for not knowing everything about the band, and I'm sorry that I don't have a million live shows that I could share with anyone. I have one live show (thanks Keith), and a very limited amount of unreleased stuff. Will, you made the interactive discography right? That is a pretty useful tool, thank you for that as well. I wasn't intending to strike a nerve with anyone, but my comments in this topic seem to have worked out for the good as I am not the only one who was glad to get the show @ Grimey's. I wouldn't call that too laughable, but I don't understand why you have stooped to the level of taking shots at Newbies on this board. Just because I haven't posted on this board every day for the past 2 years doesn't mean that I've not been a fan of the Features anyhow.

Clay

I like how off-topic this forum has gone. The Features on ABC, now that does Rock.

(Edited by MoreLikeVernie at 10:33 pm on Feb. 6, 2005)
Posted  Sunday, February 6, 2005 at 6:00 PM
Post 116 of 140
"Quote from MoreLikeVernie on Feb. 6, 2005 at 4:36 PM"
"Quote"
Will

As for my 10 posts, I'm sure there's a decent percentage of people like me who simply read this forum a lot without posting.

Just because I haven't posted on this board every day for the past 2 years doesn't mean that I've not been a fan of the Features anyhow.
I agree with ya there. I am on here quite a bit, but it's mainly to hear about where and when the Features are playing and to hear all of the great feedback from their gigs. I don't post much, but damnit I love the Features! biggrin.gif
Posted  Sunday, February 6, 2005 at 9:41 PM
Post 117 of 140
"Quote from MoreLikeVernie on Feb. 6, 2005 at 4:36 PM"
As for my 10 posts, I'm sure there's a decent percentage of people like me who simply read this forum a lot without posting. ...  Maybe there are some people on this board who should act a bit "friendlier" to newbies who come on this forum and want to know or find out stuff about the band instead of trying to call them out for asking a simple question.  I'm sorry for not knowing everything about the band...  I don't understand why you have stooped to the level of taking shots at Newbies on this board.  Just because I haven't posted on this board every day for the past 2 years doesn't mean that I've not been a fan of the Features anyhow.

Clay
Clay,

I have deja vu by reading all of this. Many others have posted similar things in the past. You are dead right. There are many people on this forum that aren't very nice. And if you post anything that may go against the grain, or with less than pefect grammar, you'll be picked to shreds. Which is a shame really. It deters many fans from posting at all and keeps them simply logging on to read the latest happenings. From what I have seen in the past, it's best to just let it go. If you keep on arguing with the so-called self-acclaimed "elite" you will cause more trouble than it is worth. Fans have a tendancy to claim ownership of a band. "You're not a real fan, I've known the band for 8 years." It's a shame the elders and elite aren't embrassing new fans in such an opportune time as now, rather than shunning them away. Although, I think you will find that those who come across so rudely, are mostly nice people. It may just be hard for the elite to accept all of the changes and realize that new fans are just trying to learn about the band and become even bigger fans. I commend you for posting what was really on your mind.


As a late edited addition to this posting:
Everything I said above is just an observation and is not directed at anyone in particular but at everyone. Will rarely posts and has been a fan for a very long time. Whatever was said obviously struck a chord directly with Will and he responded. I do however think that in general, this forum can be a negative environment for many fans especially new ones. The constant bickering can be somewhat mildly entertaining, but disturbing and a turn off also.

(Edited by PokeyDot at 10:40 pm on Feb. 6, 2005)
Posted  Sunday, February 6, 2005 at 11:22 PM
Post 118 of 140
This conversation has become tiresome. Let's get back to talking about either The Features on TV or me.
I TOTALLY AGREE!


Keith, you are destined to rock. Never forget this.
-SLACK

Posted  Monday, February 7, 2005 at 1:26 AM
Post 119 of 140
"Quote from Keith on Feb. 6, 2005 at 11:22 PM"
This conversation has become tiresome. Let's get back to talking about either The Features on TV or me.
I'd like to make it known that not only does RD give good crack and bootlegs, but he also produces some good head. Head that I believe should be given freely and to any new person on the board.

But don't take my word for it. Ask Keith.
Posted  Monday, February 7, 2005 at 3:40 AM
Post 120 of 140
"Quote from MoreLikeVernie on Feb. 6, 2005 at 5:36 PM"
Will, you made the interactive discography right? That is a pretty useful tool, thank you for that as well.
Oh God, not that. wink.gif

Yeah, that was me. Thanks for the kind words. I need to find a new place to put it, but more than that, I need to redo and update it. It's been some time indeed (you know, that whole "finishing school thing got in the way). I'd probably need to (again) call on people to fill me in on the songs that disappeared (when I last updated it, "Love Is Golden" was new and still being played, for instance, and "Arkada" and "Hold Me Alone" weren't around... I think it's a useful thing to have, especially given the way we're privelidged enough to be able to follow the creation of new songs so intimately. But I can't keep track of "most recent performance" anymore, and they're big enough that we can't really follow that anyway (until they get even bigger and someone bootlegs every show). I do intend to make it useful again (it is now so out of date that I doubt it is as useful anymore), but more than that, i now get paid to do graphics and web work for a living. Not design, so I can't make it look *ALL* that better, but I can do a damn sight better than I have done right now. One day...

But enough about that. I need to respond... it was certainly out of line for me to say what I did how I said it. I meant what I said, to a point, but it came out all wrong.

I certainly didn't intend to belittle you (or anyone else) for having made only a handful of posts. That's cool. There's a school of thought that says you should be proud that you've not lost as much time as the rest of us on this silly little message board. It isn't a flawed argument. There's also, as Pokey pointed out, a number of folks that simply don't shoot their mouths off the way the rest of us do. Hell, I don't shoot it off like I used to (contrary to recent behavior).

But there's still alot to be said for the argument that I (rather poorly) made. I've seen far too many people show up, ask for bootlegs within the first couple of days, and get angry when people don't give them something. That's not fair to the people that have made bootlegs: to RD. When someone shows up with a sense of entitlement, there's a certain tendency to jump back. People are alot more willing to help out people that stick around, or ask graciously and without demand in their tone. Pokey's stuck around, and Clay, you've been around longer than I gave you credit for (now that I take the time to actually look). All told, we do what we can, when we can, for the people we feel good about doing stuff for. I use the "royal we," but I don't do much, nor have I the means to.

Is all of this elitism? There's a tendency to call this place elitist. Maybe it is; I've never seen it that way. Maybe I'm part of the elite? I've never seen it that way. I've just been here longer than some. But take jamiecarrol, for example... a less elitist person I've never met (where's he been, anyway?). People joke around alot, sure, and newbies are given shit for being annoying (not for "not knowing everything," but for being annoying in more tangible ways... someone point me to an example of a simple question of fact that led to someone being treated wrongly), but it's typically because they're being annoying, and you can see that plain as day. So much of what anyone here says needs to be taken with a handful of salt, I think, and I guess that takes getting used to. But I've never put anyone down for "going against the grain" or "using improper grammar." Well, okay, maybe a potshot here or there awhile back at someone that showed up to cause trouble (a Features-hater) that couldn't communicate anything clearly, but that's different. I try to be civil, kind, and helpful to new fans. I gladly share any knowledge I have, and the discography was certainly created with that in mind. I'm not too big to admit that I was in a bad mood this morning and I crossed the line taking you to task the way I did, and I apologize. I sympathize with being a long-distance fan; I've lived in Chicago for almost five years. And yes, I have relied on people on this board (including RD at a time) to help me keep in touch with the band's stuff. But I'll tell you that I'd been here for over a year before I did. Elitism or familiarity? Maybe it just depends which side of the fence you're on, I guess.

Stick it out here, though, and you'll find that most everyone is a really great person, and helpful as can be. There's a tendency against being as gracious with people that are new in town, but it's like any community... you've got to feel out the new neighbors before you invite them to dinner.

Wow. A more jumbled collection of thoughts I have never assembled. I need sleep.

Will

Who is curious about the number of references, intentional or not, PokeyDot made to me in the criticism... I don't tend to throw "8 years" around, do I? God, I certainly don't intend to. If I need to be taken to task for being an asshole, please, everyone, let me know.
You may like grandma's yard gnomes, but I've seen Rock City. Remember it.
Posted  Monday, February 7, 2005 at 6:53 AM
Post 121 of 140
"Quote from Keith on Feb. 6, 2005 at 11:22 PM"
This conversation has become tiresome. Let's get back to talking about either The Features on TV or me.
or nothing at all.
I can't grow a beard, and I don't like to party.
~Matthew Tiberius Pelham
Posted  Monday, February 7, 2005 at 10:05 AM
Post 122 of 140
"Quote from Keith on Feb. 6, 2005 at 11:22 PM"
Let's get back to talking about either The Features on TV or me.
So what's happening at The End on Valentine's Day?
grass stains, airplanes, anything and everything
Posted  Monday, February 7, 2005 at 5:49 PM
Post 123 of 140
ugh.
I wanna offended no persons!
Posted  Tuesday, February 8, 2005 at 7:30 AM
Post 124 of 140
"Quote from Wiyum on Feb. 7, 2005 at 4:40 AM"
I've never put anyone down for "using improper grammar."
Ok, Ok, that was me. But grammar is important! It will get you far, young lovers.
Two sips from the cup of human kindness and I'm shitfaced
Posted  Tuesday, February 8, 2005 at 8:08 AM
Post 125 of 140
uhm.... so anyway..

hey keith, thanks. i missed the acoustic show and really wanted to go. at least this way i can hear it.

and i've got boots by jeff buckley, explosions in the sky, godpseed, and sigur ros if someone wants to trade. smile.gif i got most of them off a forum that hosted .flac bootlegs. very nice.



and i make my best attempts to use correct grammar.
Posted  Tuesday, February 8, 2005 at 11:40 PM
Post 126 of 140
I'm not sure if Kimmel had anything to do with this, but The Feature's popularity on limewire has skyrocketed over the last few weeks.

53 results for TWIMTB
17 for Blow it Out
16 for The Idea of Growing Old



There are a few older ones as well. Anyway, the entire search for"The Features" ended up with 158 total results, only 12 of those belonged to another band. Impressive- now if only they would buy the cd.

*on an unrelated note, some show on MTV was playing TWIMTB today. It wasn't the Ashley Simpson show, but looked like something similar.

(Edited by joeywade at 11:44 pm on Feb. 8, 2005)
Posted  Wednesday, February 9, 2005 at 12:47 PM
Post 127 of 140
For those interested in this kind of thing, I heard The Features played Me and the Skirts for the Kimmel audience after the show went off the air.
I TOTALLY AGREE!


Keith, you are destined to rock. Never forget this.
-SLACK

Posted  Wednesday, February 9, 2005 at 1:24 PM
Post 128 of 140
"Quote from joeywade on Feb. 8, 2005 at 11:40 PM"
I'm not sure if Kimmel had anything to do with this, but The Feature's popularity on limewire has skyrocketed over the last few weeks.

53 results for TWIMTB
17 for Blow it Out
16 for The Idea of Growing Old



There are a few older ones as well. Anyway, the entire search for"The Features" ended up with 158 total results, only 12 of those belonged to another band. Impressive- now if only they would buy the cd.

*on an unrelated note, some show on MTV was playing TWIMTB today. It wasn't the Ashley Simpson show, but looked like something similar.
I heard it on "My Super Sweet 16," which is one of the most confusing and worst shows ever...and I still watch it.
~Digsy S. Slattery

My New York City Exploits
Posted  Wednesday, February 9, 2005 at 5:46 PM
Post 129 of 140
Apparently some kid from the rival school (Episcopal Academy) of my school (Haverford) and it was allegedly hilarious. Tangent.
Posted  Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 1:27 PM
Post 130 of 140
OK, enough yakking. Somebody better get me some bootlegs.
Blue site updated on 02/02/06.
Posted  Friday, February 11, 2005 at 2:38 AM
Post 131 of 140
man, i think i'm too late for the yousendit.com link. It isn't up anymore?? Does anyone know how i can catch this performance again? I'm sad that i missed it.

Please help.... thanks.
Posted  Friday, February 11, 2005 at 3:12 PM
Post 132 of 140
"Quote from dariusduritz on Feb. 11, 2005 at 2:38 AM"
man, i think i'm too late for the yousendit.com link. It isn't up anymore?? Does anyone know how i can catch this performance again? I'm sad that i missed it.

Please help.... thanks.
yeah, i'd appreciate it too... i've got a brand spankin new gmail email so i can at least hang on to the thing on my email.
Posted  Friday, February 11, 2005 at 3:46 PM
Post 133 of 140
I've got them, but I have no clue how to send them to someone else... If someone can explain it to me, I don't mind uploading it or whatever needs to be done in order for you to get it.
Posted  Friday, February 11, 2005 at 4:04 PM
Post 134 of 140
e-mail me and i can send them to you
Posted  Friday, February 18, 2005 at 5:40 PM
Post 135 of 140
"Quote from dontstaylong on Feb. 3, 2005 at 10:09 AM"
"Quote from Billy Pilgrim on Feb. 3, 2005 at 8:58 AM"
PS - They rocked, did they not?
rock they did.
*Note, this won't be interesting to most of you (or any of you)*

I guess I've figured out who you are, Billy Pilgrim. And you accused me of being the one who said "rock they did" but I have proof now that it was dontstaylong.

Sorry everyone. That was just for BP (screw PMs).
I TOTALLY AGREE!


Keith, you are destined to rock. Never forget this.
-SLACK

Posted  Friday, February 18, 2005 at 9:52 PM
Post 136 of 140
"Quote from Keith on Feb. 18, 2005 at 6:40 PM"
Sorry everyone. That was just for BP.
and me!

(Edited by mindylieu at 10:53 pm on Feb. 18, 2005)
"negro frijoles!!" ~m.m.
Posted  Saturday, February 19, 2005 at 9:32 AM
Post 137 of 140
"I've got some great pre-new millenium stuff that I doubt many/any other people have, including one that may even pre-date their Spongebath days, so hit me up via PM or jakob.dorof@gmail.com and we can work something out..."


Jakob,
You mentioned pre Spongebath recordings. I was curious as to which ones those would be. I have a recording from the Thunder 94 performance in 90 something (Don and Jason were still in the band). I might be able to dig up a couple of other studio recordings (Dorch (sp?) and Carter's (the magnificent) stuff)

New to posting on the board, but I have read it for awhile.


Rock on
Freddie
"It's not that the little dipper is that little; it's just that the big dipper is so fucking huge."

-DJS aka "Vitamin D"
Posted  Saturday, February 19, 2005 at 10:05 AM
Post 138 of 140
Freddy: e-mail me. ^
Posted  Monday, February 21, 2005 at 6:32 PM
Post 139 of 140
"Quote from Keith on Feb. 18, 2005 at 5:40 PM"
"Quote from dontstaylong on Feb. 3, 2005 at 10:09 AM"
"Quote from Billy Pilgrim on Feb. 3, 2005 at 8:58 AM"
PS - They rocked, did they not?
rock they did.
*Note, this won't be interesting to most of you (or any of you)*

I guess I've figured out who you are, Billy Pilgrim. And you accused me of being the one who said "rock they did" but I have proof now that it was dontstaylong.

Sorry everyone. That was just for BP (screw PMs).
......am i in trouble for using awkward grammar?
Posted  Monday, February 21, 2005 at 11:42 PM
Post 140 of 140
No, I was just credited for what you said.
I TOTALLY AGREE!


Keith, you are destined to rock. Never forget this.
-SLACK