
Quote from foldsfan on Nov. 6, 2003 at 3:39 AM


Quote from BrianW on Nov. 6, 2003 at 1:27 AM

I would assume Lauren is talking about the preemptive strike against Iraq and not the war against Afghanistan and Bin Laden who was given protection there, but she can answer that for herself.
Let's not confuse 9/11 with Saddam and Iraq. This country was easily fooled into believing he was responsible for the attack and it's been proven countless times that he was not. You know, this is the sort of "urban myth" that's right up there with "can deploy weapons of mass destruction in 20 minutes" and all that jazz.
Yeah, I see. I wasn't thinking about Saddam. True, he wasn't directly responsible (but who really knows who all was behind that?) and he shouldn't be blamed. Also, Bush even said he was going in to Iraq because of the violation of the terms of the cease-fire and noncompliance and all that. but, I think 9-11 still made a difference, I'm almost sure of it, in our involvement in Iraq. It made the Saddam's violations that were somewhat small before more pressing and seemed like we needed to act swiftly. That's what I was talking about.
I get frustrated, too. Some guy on the real world had just watched Bush's speech and said something to the effect of 'we need to go get Saddam for what he did on Sept. 11th' and 'I agree with whatever Bush wants to do'. I'm not sure where some of those people got it, but Bush never said it.
have to get back to work.
The funny thing is, (welll scary actually) I just read an article about how Tariq Aziz (Saddam's foreign minister) has said during interrogation that as far as he knew, Iraq had been compliant with all of the sanctions except the restriction on the 150km missile range.
Aziz said that he had advised Saddam to not deploy those weapons. Saddam had disagreed with him on what the terms were. Hussein saw that ban as a direct violation of Iraq's sovereign right to defend itself. His missiles had conventional warheads on them, and no WMD. His argument was that any of his neighbors could strike Baghdad with a missile strike and Iraq couldn't retaliate.
As for not owning up to the WMD part, Aziz said that Saddam was terrified that if his hostile neighbors knew he didn't have WMD he'd be overrun, because they knew his army was decimated by Gulf I. They were trying to work behind the scenes to do anything they could to let the US know they had shut down the WMD program as early as 98. The Bush admin would hear nothing of it. We had closed all diplomatic channels directly with Iraq as early as December of 2002.
Don't get me wrong, Hussein is a bad man, but we have US soldiers dying in a war that is the global equivalent to the 12 year old bully knocking down the 5 year olds "fort" made of sticks. All becuase W has a burr in his ass because Saddam tried to kill daddy, WHEN WE WERE AT WAR WITH THEM THE FIRST TIME!!!! Weren't we trying to kill him?'
We need to get Bush out of office this next time around, or our standing as the rational and just nation of the world will go right down the tubes. There is damag done, but we can repair it.